Social media sites Facebook and twitter were blamed today by Government and Metropolitan Police spokespeople for fanning the UK #Londonriots and looting over the weekend. Fingers were pointed at these social networking sites for the fact that they enable people to send out calls for people to gather together.
The disturbances happened after the fatal shooting of Tottenham father of four Mark Duggan who was allegedly killed in a minicab on Thursday by police firearm officers.
Blaming these sites is just placing a distraction for the real reasons for the unlawful behaviour that took place, highlighting a lack of understanding or will to understand of how people use social media today.
In fact, as Partner at Engine group Jonathan Akwue points out in his blog, it wasn’t Facebook or Twitter that fuelled the riots, but most probably BBM – BlackBerry Messenger. BlackBerry is the phone of choice amongst a young demographic that took part in the riots, primarily because of BBM is virtually free (You just need a BlackBerry data plan) and unlike Facebook and Twitter, which are both open, it’s truly private.
BBM messages are encrypted and run through Research In Motion’s Canadian servers, and issue that has created many problems for the firm in India and the UAE, where they were threatened with being banned unless their encrypted communications were ‘opened-up’.
Emirates247 reported on 26th July that Abu Dhabi Police have warned that ‘spreading malicious rumours and fake news through BlackBerry messenger (BBM) is punishable by law and offenders could by jailed up to three years.’ The question now is if the UK Government is with it’s tarring of social networking and the recent extension of the #phonehacking judicial review going to push for something similar given that BBM is in all sense a private forum that is difficult to listen in on.
Blaming social networks is just a distraction, facilitating a reason for a possible change in policy that could be rushed through without understanding how these communication channels work. But think about it, why would anybody wanting to do a crime share it on an open network? Why not use a private channel? Why can’t lawmakers understand this simple fact?
During the weekend riots Twitter was the channel used to report what was unfolding in Tottenham, Edmonton and Brixton. A channel that captured in real-time what was organised on the locked-down BBM network. If you wanted a real-time update you went to Twitter and used relevant search terms.
As Omar said in The Wire, “the game’s out there, and it’s play or get played. That simple.” And at the moment the authorities are getting played. Blaming social media confirms the distance that exists between them and the reasons that trigger the unrests.
*** UPDATE ***
BlackBerry UK have released the following statement in response to the use of BBM, ‘As in all markets around the world where BlackBerry is available, we cooperate with local telecommunications operators, law enforcement and regulatory officials. Similar to other technology providers in the UK we comply with The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act and co-operate fully with the Home Office and UK police forces.’















Social Media in 2011 – A Review
Friday, December 30th, 2011This time last year I made a series of predictions about social media and public relations. I suggested that while 2010 was a year of discovery, the past 2011 was going to be about sharing and engaging. About communities being empowered by the knowledge they will have pooled together. I highlighted from my perspective the challenges and opportunities that Facebook, Twitter and YouTube will pose for companies and individuals. The impact that social networking has had on events during the past year has truly been beyond what anybody could have expected.
While 2010 was about Wikileaks, the past year has been about challenging the reputation of companies, organisations and individuals that used the law to hide their indiscretions. Twitter and other social networks came into their own as members of the legal profession struggled to grasp the structure of communications across international jurisdictions.
In my post ‘2011, A Year Of Change In Public Relations,’ I said that the coming year was going to be about communities that were engaged and empowered. Wikileaks showed what you could do privately. Facebook, Twitter and YouTube were the channels through which you could anonymously share content and opinion. They are the channels that gathered a community together, empowering them to seek the transparency that was far too often absent. Even the once trusted media estate came under the gaze of the community.
The Arab Spring in North Africa was an occasion that surprised many commentators. Sharing of stories on Twitter about high-profile individuals was going to happen. Managing reputations has now moved into a real-time business. In fact, if something wrong has been done it is today best expected that such an act will become public.
Last year I also raised the point about the power of mobile, of cellphones. Wherever you are you have a cellphone. You are connected to a world of real time information that reaches you as quickly as you wish to access the news that is available. News shared by the network that you are connected to. Reliance on traditional news channels is long gone. News is shaped by members of the communities that we trust, which is why from a public relations perspective crises are today that when audiences go negative on a brand, cause or individual.
As I stated, news organisations are not dead and they are certainly not dying. They are just changing and adapting to become what their primary audience wants of them. An adoption that will continue in the 2012.
But what about the coming year? Well, I am finishing my thoughts on this and will share these with you pretty soon.
Tags: 2011, audience, content, facebook, journalism, mobile, news, pr, publicrelations, publishing, reputation, socialmedia, socialnetworking, transparency, twitter, youtube
Posted in comment, journalism, media, pr, social media | No Comments »