However you want to describe it, online and social media is playing an important part in shaping the reputation of brands around the world. It’s been doing so for some time now, certainly a few years. The issue at hand though, the one that New Media Knowledge (NMK) raised at their ‘What happens to online PR?’ event last week was if the Public Relations industry was best suited to lead clients through the ever-changing digital media landscape.
Led by New Media Age Editor-in-Chief Mike Nutley the NMK team brought together MD and founder of Wolfstar Stuart Bruce, Head of Social Media at iCrossing Anthony Mayfield, Global Head of Digital at Weber Shandwick James Warren and Founder and MD of Content and Motion Roger Warner. A great panel, though apart from Mike, sadly lacking journalists or independent bloggers that make their living from building or knocking down the brands that PRs work so hard on.
On one side we had the argument that PR is and should be just about press and media relations, which is what we were told clients expect from their PR teams or agencies – an outdated thought. Some of those present even claimed that PR agencies find it difficult to re-invent themselves, which is why online PR should be left to niche digital agencies, which “better understood this channel.”
Fifteen years ago this might have been the case when it was all about the technology and not the PR or the message. It was about something new that only a few people understood yet everybody wanted a piece of the action. Not any more though.
On the other side you had those who believe that it’s PRs that should continue guiding clients through the digital world. PRs that have experience in reputation building and management, people who know how integrated communications campaigns work. Who know have experience in developing influence and creating relationships.
The interesting point that came through from the evening was that digital media is still seen as niche and not a communications channel that would be part of any overall campaign planning. Some even complained that within certain agencies, they were seen as an ‘add-on’. They weren’t integrated, mainly because clients had the ‘get me in the FT’ attitude to their work, even though their reputation was more at risk from bloggers and social networkers. Something that is true given that staff in newsrooms around the world are experiencing a bloody cull. But, educating clients and employers takes time.
There was broad agreement on the fact that online and social media is all about credibility. There is a difference between a pastime and a service. Comms teams need to have social media people within, they need to be able to use their knowledge to develop campaigns.
Clients and employers know and are used to buying press relations services, but they need to understand about social and online media. This new channel needs to be quantified and measurement tools need to be refined so that they can understand the importance and influence that it has on audiences that they want to communicate with.
At the end of the day, PRs are here to serve clients, to put on the table solutions to issues they face. Communications is becoming much more integrated, with PR moving more to the centre of decision making, shaping the strategy not just for consumer campaigns, but advertising ones.
Social and online media is a new channel and needs to receive the attention that it deserves.















Reward your customers and save your reputation, the O2 way
Wednesday, June 10th, 2009Apple
Britain is a country with little focus on customer care. In fact for many UK businesses rewarding customers for their spend and loyalty appears to be an after thought. Rarely do companies invest in their customers so to get them to do the ‘word-of-mouth’ sale on their behalf, which as we know is the best endorsement and way to get new customers in.
Just look at UK mobile phone operator O2, which yesterday released details of it’s pricing policy for the Apple’s much anticipated iPhone 3GS, over which it has exclusive UK rights. The sting wasn’t the 18-month fee of between £96 and £274 depending on your tariff, but the cost for current customers who signed up for the minimum term this time last year. Existing customers were told that they would have to pay for the remaining terms of their existing iPhone 3G contracts, which could be anything over £150. All very different to when O2 offered a free upgrade from the first iPhone to the current hand-set.
You would have thought that pricing policy for such a desirable product would have been developed whereby existing customers aren’t made to feel hostage. In fact, the sweets have been offered to new customers while existing ones are being ignored. A big mistake given that many O2 iPhone users have turned against the company, complaining not just about its pricing policy but it’s lamentable 3G nationwide coverage, to name but a few points.
You wonder why the company didn’t think of empowering its customers with new models so to reward them and encourage them to further promote the company and brand to others. Blogs though are being written picking on all of O2s issues, working to dissuade customers from switching to a company that cares little for their users.
The #O2fail hashtag and Twitition on Twitter have over 2100 people signed-up. And the blogosphere is certainly working hard to knock O2 where it hurts. The media is also running stories, with The Daily Telegraph and Sky News highlighting the concerns from loyal customers.
As it stands and having set a populist precedent with the free upgrade between the first and second generation iPhone O2 have a lot to do to stop the steady stream of complains. It takes a lot to build a reputation and it looks like they’ve forgotten the golden rule of ‘looking after our customers’ first.
Tags: #o2fail, apple, brand, iPhone, loyalty, mobile, o2, pricing, reputation, rewards, telecomms
Posted in comment, consumer, media, mobile, news, pr | 2 Comments »