Less that a month after the Bell Pottinger gets caught boasting about using ‘dark arts’ and ‘having a team that could sort Wikipedia,’ it appears that another agency has been outed.
Rival public relations agency Portland Communications has been caught by West Brom MP Tom Watson for trying to edit out the name of Stella Artois, a brand owned by Portland client inBev, from the Wikipedia description page for Wife-beater.
Watson rightly suggests in Portland Communications Wikipedia discussion page that agencies list their clients in their own Wikipedia entries so to declare conflict of interest and as I suspect for transparency sake.
What is interesting is that at 16.31 today (04/01/2012) Wikipedia user Portlander11 edits Portland Communications Wikipedia page and adds, ‘Current and previous clients include BTA Bank, Mukhtar Ablyazov and AB InBev,’ before adding, ‘The reason for this change is that Mr Ablyazov is not and never has been a client of Portland Communications.’ That final statement is very clear, stating that Mr Ablyazov ‘is not and has never been a client of Portland Communications.‘
Looking at the Wikipedia page for Mr Mukhtar Ablyazov one sees that the page has been edited on a regular basis, mostly by registered Wikipedia users. A number of edits though are from a user whose IP address has been captured as ‘83.244.252.242.’ This IP address has the following hostname associated with it, ‘mx9.portland-communications.com.’ Perhaps, that bold and unambiguous statement is not as accurate as Portlander11 led many people, including Tom Watson MP to believe.
The fact is that fingerprints exist online. The web connects people. Wikipedia and social networking site brings groups together that act as editors and fact checkers, something, it appears that some public relations consultancies are yet to understand.
UPDATE: I should point you to two blog posts that were equally published yesterday by Stuart Bruce and Phil Gomes, the latter calling on Wikipedia to ‘have an open, constructive and fair discussion about the important issues where public relations and Wikipedia interset.’














Facebook Credits: The Currency Of Choice?
Monday, April 4th, 2011Facebook Credits
Facebook Credits came out of beta in January this year. Since it was launched in May 2009 in alpha it was believed that Credits would be used solely by people playing social games such as FarmVille and Mafia Wars. Virtual currency would give gamers that added experience when competing with their friends on Facebook. Those thinking that might have missed the whole point about Facebook having it’s own currency and the opportunity that it presents to companies and causes.
During the last two years Facebook has been rolling out a series of offerings such as Facebook Connect that have enabled users to log-in to third party sites with their Facebook account. This made the social networking site into an aggregator, allowing users to not just publish, but see what people within their network like online – based on websites that adopted Facebook Connect.
More recently Facebook has been rolling out it’s Questions and Comments applications. The latter has been received plenty of views from the social media community. Techcrunch’s Jon Evans says that Comments epitomizes everything that he hates about Facebook, before adding that because it is so simple he might end up using it. Comments allows Facebook to further plough into third party sites. It is becoming the platform of choice for websites. Why? Well because everyone appears to be on it. In the UK there are now 30 million individual users, 35 million in Indonesia and many million more in the US.
I came back from Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia and what I learnt is how quickly they started to trade on Facebook. E-commerce is being replaced by f-commerce. Businesses are realising than rather that spending money to get people to spend money on their sites, perhaps they should be investing to get the business of people on Facebook – cross the road to sell to your audience rather than get the audience to cross the road. Sounds simple, yet for many businesses a step too far.
Today you can buy airline tickets, clothes, tickets, just about anything. Business is slowly realising that Facebook is also a site through which you can sell.
Facebook Credits might in the future be another extension that can be implanted onto third party sites. The days though have passed when the cashier used to ask if “sir would be paying by cash or credit?” PayPal is now looking over its shoulders at the over 500 million account mammoth that is bearing down. “Will that be with PayPal or Facebook Credits sir?”
Who knows, perhaps one day we will all pull up a paywall that will charge Facebook Credits, which we can then redeem on other people’s sites. Crazy idea, but you heard it here first!
Tags: business, currency, ecommerce, f-commerce, facebook, games, marketing, online, paypal, sales
Posted in comment, social media | 5 Comments »