about.me

Julio Romo

Julio Romo

Dubai based Digital, PR, Communications and Innovation Consultant.

Contact me

Insight on all things #Digital, #PR and #Communications and #Innovation. Technology and knowledge to shape your business and reputation.

t: +971 50 225 9532

e: info@twofourseven.co.uk

My status

Contributing Author: Share This – The Social Media Handbook for PR Professionals.

Download To Your Kindle A Copy Of The Highly Acclaimed Book

Download To Your Kindle

Also Available from the Apple iBook UK Store for your Mac, iPad and iPhone.

Share This - CIPR

Read My Blog on Your Kindle:

Read my blog on Kindle

Blogarama - The Blog Directory

Twitter

Online Reputation Management PR – Don’t Use In Isolation

June 3 2011 02.42 | 02 Comments

The Times ran a story this week on how celebrities were using PR agencies to drive bad news that is circulated online away from public’s view – burying it away in pages people rarely visit.  Times reporter Billy Kenber followed up his initial piece with further insight on how some agencies work.  There is a problem with his piece though, that being the insinuation that it’s solely PR agencies that are behind these shady practices.

Reputation management as we know is not a new discipline within public relations.  The skills needed have been around for many, many years.  That said, since today we are influenced by what we read online and what our friends and peers share with us the need and demand for online reputation management (ORM) has dramatically increased.

Reputation is at the core of any business. It shapes our trust with brands and individuals.  If that trust is challenged we take our business elsewhere, which is why in today’s real-time and connected world it is essential to keep track of how communities can build or break reputations.

Kenber gave the example of Woburn Safari Park who allegedly paid an agency to bury news stories about a critical report from the Department for Environment , Food and Rural Affairs  (DEFRA) on the conditions of the animals in its care.  Weeks after stories were published The Times reported that the park hired the services of an online reputation management agency.  If this is all it did then rightly so one can be critical of how it acted given DEFRA’s findings.  Certainly not a way of repairing a reputation.

Online reputation management agencies are not public relations agencies.  There is a need for their services, but these should be used as part of a much more strategic campaign.  Burying bad news and the associated debate that takes place online is not going job is not going to serve a company good in the long-term.  In fact it is likely to do further damage.

Public Relations is about reputation.  It is as the CIPR states about ‘the planned and sustained effort to establish and maintain goodwill and mutual understanding between an organisation and its publics.’  Key words here are planned and sustained.  Making a sustained effort is much more that just burying news, much more that negative briefings.  It is in today’s business and consumer environment about real-time decisions that can humanise a brand and assist it in gaining support and the much needed understanding.

There is a need for the skills that Kenber highlights.  We have seen plenty of examples of how small businesses have suffered because of critical online reviews that have either been wide of the mark or libellous.  We should remember that people have different standards and can quickly mount negative online assaults, often without realising how they are opening themselves up to a legal dispute.

PR agencies do use whatever is needed help organisations protect their reputation.  But, it is these PR agencies that use these tools in proportion to what is needed to achieve.  If a client or employer has messed up the damage has been done.  Doing what Kenber talks about only makes matters worse.  A professional communications agency would have advised to stay clear of burying bad online news.  Agencies that would do this kind of work, do it without understanding the bigger picture.

Comments (2)

mediamogul82 says:

Burying anything is detrimental to the reputation of any organisation. I agree with David – it will catch with you eventually and the repercussions can sometimes be irreversible.
Definitely not part of PR.

-Esh

What proper PR people already know is that because of the effects of internet Agency, porosity and transparency (CIPR/PRCA Internet Commission 2000), such tactics will both come to light and will be stunningly damaging to reputation. It is only a matter or time.

Only the Times could be fooled into believing this could be PR. Is it the company their journalists keep at work?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>